AbstractIntroduction: Although Emergency Department (ED) patients are to be screened for domestic violence (DV), not all patients are screened. The objectives of this study were to quantify rural community hospital overall ED patient DV screening rates and positive DV screen rates.
Methods: In this retrospective chart review, a total of 1,200 of 13,336 patient ED visits were randomly selected. Patients were excluded who presented with cardiac or respiratory arrest, mental health diagnoses, or major trauma; were transferred or arrived from long term care facilities; or were victims of sexual assault. Data was collected on demographics, language, and three key factors for DV per nurse documentation (reported physical or sexual assault, fear, and objective signs). This study was reviewed by an Institutional Review Board.
Results: Eighty-eight percent (N=1,056) of rural ED patients in this study sample had documentation for DV screening being completed. Of these, 2% (n=21) had documentation positive for DV. Of those positive, the majority were female (62%), English speaking (86%) patients with an average age of 29 years. Eighty-six percent reported assault, 33% reported fear, and 19% had objective signs of DV.
Conclusions: The overall DV screening rate of 88% supports the recommendation that all hospitals should ensure they have 100% DV screening rate compliance. The low 2% positive DV screening rate suggests the need for future research to determine DV screening barriers for both nurses and patients.
Keywords: Domestic Violence; Screening; Rural Hospitals; Emergency Departments
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share (for non-commerical purposes) the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).