Increasing Human Papillomavirus Knowledge in Rural Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14574/d12kdx24Keywords:
human papillomavirus, health education, vaccine hesitancy, rural providersAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to implement and evaluate a consistent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine education program in a family planning clinic serving rural residents as a part of a doctoral nursing scholarly project.
Sample: Female patients aged 18 to 26 years who had not received prior HPV vaccination
Method: Demographic and survey data were collected from participants to assess the change in knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccination. McNemar’s Chi-square analysis was used measure the effectiveness of the education program.
Findings: Six of the 13 survey items had statistically significant differences in pre- and post-survey scores. There was increased knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccination among all participants.
Conclusions: Based on the results of this quality improvement project, education can improve knowledge about HPV, its health outcomes, and the vaccination. Increased knowledge can increase the uptake of the HPV vaccine, thus reducing rates of related negative health outcomes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share (for non-commerical purposes) the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).