The Impact of Rural Hospital Closures on Emergency Medical Services Transport Times

Authors

  • Todd Brenton Smith The University of Alabama, Capstone College of Nursing https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-5066
  • Thomas MacAndrew English University of Alabama, Management
  • Marilyn Whitman The University of Alabama, Management
  • Dwight Lewis The University of Alabama, Management
  • Abbey Gregg The University of Alabama, College of Community Health Sciences

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies have found disparities in emergency medical service (EMS) transports for rural residents including double the average response time and lower patient survival rates when compared with their urban counterparts. Since 2012, the rate of rural hospitals closures has risen alarmingly from previous years. Previous studies have linked the closure of rural hospitals to increased EMS transport and total activation time. However, data and methods used in previous studies have not included facility-level characteristics, which limits the ability to tease out the nuances of each closure. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the impact of rural hospital closures on EMS travel time, as well as the characteristics of the closed hospitals.

Sample: Data sources for the study came from a state-level EMS database, the CMS Provider of Service files, and state-level hospital data reports. 

Methods: Geographic information system software was used to geocode hospital locations and generate service areas based on drive times. We identified rural hospitals that closed in Alabama between 2010-2018 and then identified the 911 call data from the state’s EMS database that occurred within close proximity of each of the hospitals of interest, resulting in a sample of 120,802 EMS calls.

Findings: We identified five hospital closures within our time period.  For one of the five closures, EMS transport time to the emergency department increased by thirteen minutes post-closure. In two of the five closures, transport time increased by five minutes or less. In two instances, however, transport time decreased.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that not all rural hospital closures result in increased EMS transport times as rural patients may have already been routinely transported to alternate hospitals.  Additionally, specific characteristics of a hospital pre-closure may be related to changes in EMS travel times that occur post-closure.

Keywords: Rural health, emergency medical services, access, hospital closure, travel distance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v22i1.690

Author Biographies

  • Todd Brenton Smith, The University of Alabama, Capstone College of Nursing

    PhD, MSHA, MBA, BSN, NEA-BC

    Assistant Professor, Capstone College of Nursing, University of Alabama

  • Thomas MacAndrew English, University of Alabama, Management

    PhD

    Assistant Professor, University of Alabama, Management

  • Marilyn Whitman, The University of Alabama, Management

    PhD

    Professor and HealthSouth Endowed Chair in Healthcare Management, University of Alabama, Management

  • Dwight Lewis, The University of Alabama, Management

    PhD

    Assistant Professor, University of Alabama, Management

  • Abbey Gregg, The University of Alabama, College of Community Health Sciences

    PhD

    Assistant Professor, University of Alabama, College of Community Health Sciences

Downloads

Published

2022-05-16

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022): Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care, 22(1)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share (for non-commerical purposes) the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).