Purpose: Develop a quality improvement plan to begin a biphasic depression screening process for rural people 65 years and older residing in two counties in south-central Nebraska. Sample: Project initiation involved retrospective chart review of a convenience sample of 50 adults, 65 years or older with a known diagnosis of anxiety or depression residing in south-central Nebraska.
Method: A quality improvement design based on the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) model, charts a prescribed four-stage cyclic learning process while compatible with the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services Framework (PARiHS) model for evidence-based practice (EBP), emphasizing the significance of organizational culture. An interprofessional (IP) small-team approach provided momentum into full organization expansion through a three-cycle operational plan.
Findings: The project used descriptive statistics providing aggregate demographic data while delivering a means to measure progress towards goal acquisition.
Conclusion: Use of the convenience sample indicated the need to standardize secondary depression screening processes within a vulnerable rural population. Outcomes demonstrate goal achievement with the consistent use of electronic medical record (EMR) supported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) data for the older adult. However, a breakdown occurred when the organization was reliant on face-to-face communication in notifying the healthcare provider when the PHQ-2 triggered the need for the more detailed PHQ-9. A gap in primary care for older men discovered with implications for improving the accessibility of healthcare in the future.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share (for non-commerical purposes) the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).