Impact Evaluation of Nurse Advocacy Center for Underserved on Population Health

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to describe a project undertaken to measure the impact of an academic/practice partnership, the Nurse Advocacy Center for Underserved (NACU), on the population health of the region with a goal to design an impact evaluation to measure outcomes of an academic/practice partnership.
Sample/Method: The sample included clients, staff, students, faculty, and volunteers from NACU sites.  Data was collected through patient survey, focus groups, check-sheet, and satisfaction survey.  Analysis was informed by a logic model and the Triple Aim.
Findings:   Results of focus groups identified themes of advocacy, environment, substance abuse, access, and preventative services. Check-sheet results revealed useful areas for measuring impact on regional health were perception of health and Hepatitis C status.   Satisfaction survey results demonstrated that the experience in providing services through NACU was rated as good (10%), very good (50%), and excellent (40%) for non-students and good (15%), very good (23%), excellent (42%) for students.  Findings support that NACU impact measures align with the foci areas identified by regional Health Department and greater community. 
Conclusions:   A comprehensive impact evaluation is effective in measuring impact of the academic/practice partnership NACU on the health of the community and region.  Dissemination of results will foster similar initiatives that address population health by creating academic/practice partnerships that focus on health care disparities among the underserved.  Academic/practice partnerships can adapt this logic model evaluation strategy for use in determining impact on similar populations, particularly in areas where access is limited such as rural communities.  Population health capacity will be expanded through the dissemination of evidence related to developing and maintaining community and public health partnerships, building public health competence through such partnerships, and improving the health of target populations in urban, suburban, and rural communities. 
Keywords:  health impact assessment, vulnerable populations, population health, program evaluation, health care quality, access, evaluation 
DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v18i2.518  

 

https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v18i2.518
PDF

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share (for non-commerical purposes) the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).