Quality of Life, Chronic Pain, and Issues for Healthcare Professionals in Rural Communities

Authors

  • Anita C All Auburn University
  • Juliet H. Fried University of Northern Colorado
  • Debra C. Wallace University of Tennessee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v1i2.488

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to examine differences that existed in the perception of individuals with chronic pain concerning quality of life in two groups: (1) a group who had an intervention for chronic pain (2) and a group who had not had any intervention. No existing literature was found that compared any difference in perceptions of quality of life in individuals who had an intervention for chronic pain and those who had not had an intervention for chronic pain. Thirty-six individuals' scores on the Ferrans and Power's Quality of Life Index were analyzed. Data analysis revealed that both groups in this pilot study perceived their quality of life as decreased, but no statistically significant differences were found in the perception of either group (t = -1.65, p= .108). Although not statistically significant in this sample, the group (n=16) who had received an intervention program reported less perceived quality of life. Issues of concern for healthcare professionals in rural communities and ideas for further research are presented.

Keywords: chronic pain, quality of life, rural healthcare

http://dx.doi.org/10.14574/ojrnhc.v1i2.488

Author Biography

  • Anita C All, Auburn University
    PhD., RN Professor and Director Joint MSN Program Wachovia Endowed Professor

Downloads

Published

2017-08-03

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2000)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share (for non-commerical purposes) the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).